The Grammaticalization of Demonstratives: A Comparative Analysis

Catasso, Nicholas

doi:10.22425/jul.2011.12.1.7

J. Univers. Lang. 2011; 12(1):7-46

pISSN: 1598-6381

DOI: https://doi.org/10.22425/jul.2011.12.1.7

Article

The Grammaticalization of Demonstratives: A Comparative Analysis

Nicholas Catasso ¹ ^, ^†

Author Information & Copyright ▼

¹Università Ca’ Foscari di Venezia

^†Corresponding Author : Nicholas Catasso, Dipartimento di Scienze del Linguaggio - Dorsoduro 3462 - VENEZIA 30123 (VE). Phone 0039-3463157243; Email: nicholas_catasso@libero.it

Copyright ⓒ 2016, Sejong University Language Research Institue. This is an Open-Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Received: Oct , 2010; Revised: Dec , 2010; Accepted: Jan , 2011

Published Online: Jan 01, 2017

Abstract

An article, irrespective of its distribution across natural languages, dialects and varieties, is a member of the class of determiners which particularizes a noun according to language-specific principles of grammatical and semantic structuring. Definite articles in Indo- European languages – in those grammatical systems where they are present – are derived from ancient demonstratives through a grammaticalization process: given that demonstratives are deictic expressions (i.e. they depend on a frame of reference which is external to that of the speaker and of the interlocutor) with the role of selecting a referent or a set of referents, it is easy to understand what the role of “universal quantifier” of the, which is in English the prototypical – but questionable – example of definiteness, is due to. Demonstratives are frequently reanalyzed across languages as grammatical markers (very often as definite articles, but also as copulas, relative and third person pronouns, sentence connectives, focus markers, etc.). In this article I concentrate on the grammaticalization of the definite article in English, adopting a comparative-contrastive approach (including a wide range of Indo- European languages), given the complexity of the article.

Keywords: grammaticalization; definite articles; English; Indo- European languages; definiteness

REFERENCES

Aitchison, J. 2001. Language Change: Progress Or Decay? 3rd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Alexiadou, A., L. Haegeman & M. Stavrou. 2007. Noun Phrase in the Generative Perspective (Studies in Generative Grammar 71). Berlin - New York: Mouton de Gruyter.

Allan, K. 2001. Natural Language Semantics. Oxford & Malden: Blackwell Publishers.

Althaus P., H. Henne & H.E. Wiegand. 1973. Lexikon der germanistischen Linguistik, Tübingen: Niemayer.

Anderson, S. R. 2005. Aspects of the Theory of Clitics Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Anttila, R. 1972. An Introduction to Historical and Comparative Linguistics. New York: McMillan.

Askedal, J. O. 2001. 'Oblique Subjects', Structural and Lexical Case Marking: Some Thoughts on Case Assignment in North Germanic and German. Faarlund, J. T. (ed.) Grammatical Relations in Change, 65-97.

Baugh, A. C. & T. Cable. 1993. A History of the English Language. London: Routledge.

Beekes, R. 1995. Comparative Indo-European Linguistics: an Introduction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

10.

Bianchi, V. 1999. Consequences of Antisymmetry: Headed Relative Clauses, Berlin New York: Mouton de Gruyter.

11.

Bisang, W., N. Himmelmann & B. Wiemer. 2004. What Makes Grammaticalization? A Look from its Fringes and its Components. Berlin New York: Mouton de Gruyter.

12.

Booij, G., C. Lehmann & J. Mugdan. 2000. Morphologie. Ein internationales Handbuch zur Flexion und Wortbildung. Berlin-New York: Mouton de Gruyter.

13.

Braune, W. & E. Ebbinghaus. 1994. Althochdeutsches Lesebuch, 17th ed. Paris: Niemeyer.

14.

Brinton, L. J. & E. Traugott. 1995. Lexicalization and Language Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

15.

Campbell, L. 1998. Historical Linguistics: An Introduction. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

16.

Campbell, L. 2001. What's Wrong with Grammaticalization? Language Sciences 23, 113-161.

17.

Chambers, J. K. 1995. Sociolinguistic Theory: Linguistic Variation and its Social Significance, Oxford: Blackwell.

18.

Cinque, G. & G. Giusti. 1995. Advances in Roumanian Linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

19.

Crespo, E., J. De La Villa & A. R. Revuelta. 2006. Word Classes and Related Topics in Ancient Greek: Proceedings of the Conference on 'Greek Syntax and Word Classes' Held in Madrid June 2003, Madrid: Peeters Publishers.

20.

Cruttenden, A. & D. Faber. 1991. The Accentuation of Prepositions. Journal of Pragmatics 15, 265-286.

21.

Crystal, D. 1980. A First Dictionary of Linguistics and Phonetics. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

22.

Diessel, H. 1999. Demonstratives: Form, Function, and Gramma- ticalization. Amsterdam Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

23.

Diessel, H. 1999. The Morphosyntax of Demonstratives in Synchrony and Diachrony. Linguistic Typology 3, 1-49.

24.

Diessel, H. 2003. The Relationship Between Demonstratives and Interrogatives. Studies in Language 27, 581-602.

25.

Diewald, G. 2006. Context Types in Grammaticalization as Cons- tructions. Constructions 1-9, 2006. Available at URL <http://www.constructions-online.de/articles/specvol1/>.

26.

Eckardt, R. 2008. Meaning Change in Grammaticalization: An Enquiry into Semantic Reanalysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

27.

Einhauser, E. 1989. Die Junggrammatiker. Ein Problem für die Sprachwissenschaftsgeschichtsschreibung. Trier: Wissenschaftlicher Verlag.

28.

Epstein, R. 2001. The Meaning of Definite Articles in Cross- Linguistic Perspective. In: Eniko Németh (ed.). Cognition in Language Use: Selected Papers from the 7th International Pragmatics Conference, Antwerp: International Pragmatics Association, 174-189.

29.

Faingold, E. 1993. The Development of the Definite Article from Latin to Spanish and Portuguese. Paper presented at the 1993 Annual Meeting of the Linguistic Society of America, Los Angeles, California. Jan. 1993.

30.

Fillmore, C.J. 1988. The Mechanism of 'Construction Grammar', Proceedings of the Fourteenth Annual Meeting of the Berkley Linguistic Society. Berkley: University of California Press. 35- 55.

31.

Fischer, O, M. Norde & H. Perridon. 2004. Up and down the Cline - The Nature of Grammaticalization. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

32.

Fortson, B. W. 2004. Indo-European Language and Culture. London: Blackwell Publishers.

33.

Fox, A. 1995. Linguistic Reconstruction. An Introduction to Theory and Method. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

34.

Gebert, L. 1996. Riflessioni sull'Articolo Mai Nato nelle Lingue Slave. In Bernacchio R. et al., Determinatezza e Indeterminatezza nelle Lingue Slave, Padova: Unipress.

35.

Ghomeshi, J., I. Paul & M. Wiltschko. 2009. Determiners: Universals and Variation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

36.

Giacalone R., A. 2008. Areal Convergence in Grammaticalization Processes. In López-Couso, M. J. & E. Seoane (eds.), Rethinking grammaticalization: New Perspectives for the Twenty- First Century. Amsterdam - Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

37.

Giusti, G. 1993. La Sintassi dei Determinanti. Padova: Unipress.

38.

Giusti, G. 1999. The Functional Structure of Noun Phrases. A Bare Phrase Structure Approach. Working Papers in Linguistics 9, 105-160.

39.

Givón, T. 1979. On Understanding Grammar. New York: Academic Press.

40.

Givón, T. 1991. Markedness in Grammar: Distributional, Communi- cative and Cognitive Correlates of Syntactic Structure. Studies in Language 15, 335-370.

41.

Grice, H. P. 1975. Logic and Conversation. In Cole, P. & J. Morgan, Syntax and Semantics. Speech Acts. New York: Academic Press.

42.

Greenberg, J. H. 1990. How Does a Language Acquire Gender Markers? In Denning, K. & S. Kemmer. On Language: Selected Writings of Joseph H. Greenberg. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

43.

Greenberg, J. H. 1991. The Last Stages of Grammatical Elements: Contractive and Expansive Desemanticization, in Traugott and Heine, eds., Vol.1, Approaches to Grammaticalization, Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

44.

Haegeman, L. 1997. The New Comparative Syntax. London: Longman.

45.

Haider, H., S. Olsen & S. Vikner. 1995. Studies in Comparative Syntax. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

46.

Halliday, M. 1961. Categories of the Theory of Grammar in Halliday(ed.) System and Function in Language. Oxford: Kress, 52-72.

47.

Hammond, M. & M. Noonan. 1988. Theoretical Morphology: Approaches in Modern Linguistics, San Diego: Academic Press.

48.

Harris, A. C. 2002. Endoclitics and the Origins of Udi Morphosyntax. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

49.

Haspelmath, M. 1998. Does Grammaticalization Need Reanalysis? Studies in Language 22, 315-372.

50.

Haspelmath, M. 1999. Why Is Grammaticalization Irreversible? Linguistics 37, 1043-1068.

51.

Hawkins, J. A. 2004. Efficiency and Complexity in Grammars. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

52.

Heine, B. & M. Reh 1984. Grammaticalization and Reananalysis in African Languages. Hamburg: Buske.

53.

Heine, B. & T. Kuteva. 2002. World Lexicon of Grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

54.

Hopper, P. J. & E. Traugott. 2003. Grammaticalization, 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

55.

Heine, B. & T. Kuteva. 2003. On Contact-induced Grammaticali- zation. Studies in Language 27, 529-272.

56.

Heine, B. & T. Kuteva. 2005. Language Contact and Grammatical Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

57.

Himmelmann, N. P. 1997. Deiktikon, Artikel, Nominalphrase: Zur Emergenz syntaktischer Struktur. Tübingen: Niemeyer.

58.

Hogg, R. & D. Denison. 2008. A History of the English Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

59.

Hopper, P. & E. Traugott. 2003. Grammaticalization, 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

60.

Humboldt, W. 1822. On the Origin of Grammatical forms and their Influence on the Development of Ideas. In: P. Lang. 1997. Essays on Language. Frankfurt am Main: Europäischer Verlag der Wissenschaften.

61.

Jeffers, R. J. & A. M. Zwicky. 1980. The Evolution of Clitics. In 1980. Papers from the 4th International Conference on Historical Linguistics. E. Traugott, R. LaBrum & S. Shephard. (eds.) Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

62.

Joseph, B. 2001. Is There Such a Thing as "Grammaticalization"? Language Sciences 23, 163-186.

63.

Josipovici, G. 1971. The World and the Book: A Study of Modern Fiction. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

64.

Jucker, A. H., G. Fritz & F. Lebsanft. 1999. Historical Dialogue Analysis. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

65.

Juvonen, P. 2000. Grammaticalizing the Article - A Study of Definite Adnominal Determiners in a Genre of Spoken Finnish. Stockholm: Stockholm University.

66.

Krug, M. G. 2000. Emerging English Modals. A Corpus-based Study of Grammaticalization. New York & Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

67.

Kuriłovicz, J. 1975. The Evolution of Grammatical Categories. Esquisses Linguistiques II, 38-54.

68.

Lane, G. S. 1961. On the Formation of the Indo-European Demonstrative. Language 37, 469-475.

69.

Lass, R. 1997. Historical Linguistics and Language Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

70.

Leuschner, T., T. Mortelmans & S. De Groodt. 2005. Grammatikalisierung im Deutschen, Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter.

71.

Lightfoot, D. 1999. The Development of Language: Acquisition, Change and Evolution. Oxford: Blackwell.

72.

Lyons, C. 1999. Definiteness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

73.

Marouzeau, J. 1953. Lexique de la Terminologie Linguistique. Paris: Geuthner.

74.

McMahon, A. 1994. Understanding Language Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

75.

Meillet, A. 1912, L'Evolution des Formes Grammaticales. Scientia 12, 384-400.

76.

Müller, H. H. & A. Klinge 2008. Essays on Nominal Determination. Amsterdam Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

77.

O'Neil, W. 1978. The Evolution of the Germanic Inflectional System: A Study of the Causes of Language Change. Orbis 27, 246-86.

78.

Oniga, R. 2004. Il Latino. Breve introduzione linguistica. Milano: Franco Angeli.

79.

Osawa, F. 2007. The Emergence of DP in the History of English: The Role of the Mysterious Genitive. In Historical Linguistics 2007. Selected Papers from the 18th International Conference on Historical Linguistics, M. Dufresne, F. Dupuis & E. Vocaj. (eds.) Montréal, Québec, August 2007. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

80.

Oubouzar, E. 1992. Zur Ausbildung des bestimmten Artikels im Althochdeutschen. In Y. Desportes (ed.) Althochdeutsch. Syntax und Semantik. Lyon, 71-87.

81.

Parotté, W. & R. Dirven. 1985. The Ubiquity of Metaphor. Amesterdam Studies in the Theory and History of Linguistic Science IV. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

82.

Philippi, J. 1997. The Rise of the Article in the Germanic Languages. In Parameters of Morphosyntactic Change, Van Kamenade, A. & N. Vincent. (eds.) Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 62-93.

83.

Posner, R. 1966. The Romance Languages. A Linguistic Introduction. New York: Doubleday.

84.

Radden, G. & K. U. Panther 2004. Studies in Linguistic Motivation. Cognitive Linguistics Research. Berlin New York: Mouton de Gruyter.

85.

Ramat, P. 1987. Linguistic Typology. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

86.

Renzi, L. 1992. Le Développement de l'article en Roman. Revue Roumaine de Linguistique 2, 161-176.

87.

Ringe, D. 2006. A Linguistic History of English. Volume I. From Proto-Indo-European to Proto-Germanic Oxford: Oxford University Press.

88.

Rizzi, L. 1997. The Fine Structure of the Left Periphery. In: L. Haegemann (ed.), Elements of grammar. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 281-337.

89.

Roberts, I. 1993. A Formal Account of Grammaticalization in the History of Romance Futures. Folia Linguistica Historica 13, 219-258.

90.

Roberts, I. & A. Roussou. 2003. Syntactic Change, A Minimalist Approach to Grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

91.

Salmons, J. C. & S. Dubenion-Smith 2007. Historical Linguistics 2005: Selected Papers from the 17th International Conference on Historical Linguistics, Amsterdam Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

92.

Selig, M. 1992. Die Entwicklung der Nominaldeterminanten im Spätlatein. Script-Oralia 26, 238-260.

93.

Sonderegger, S. 1979. Grundzüge Deutscher Sprachgeschichte. Diachronie des Sprachsystems. Bd. 1: Einführung, Genealogie, Konstanten. Berlin New York: Mouton de Gruyter.

94.

Song, J. J. 2001. Linguistic Typology: Morphology and Syntax. Harlow and London: Longman.

95.

Stark, E., E. Leiss & W. Abraham. 2007. Nominal Determination: Typology, Context Constraints, and Historical Emergence. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

96.

Swanton, M. 1996. The Anglo-Saxon Chronicles. London: J.M. Dent.

97.

Traugott, E. 1982. From Propositional to Textual to Expressive Meanings: Some Semantic-Pragmatic Aspects of Grammati- calization. In W.P. Lehmann & Y. Malkiel. Perspectives on Historical Linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

98.

Traugott, E. 1995. Subjectification in Grammaticalisation. In: D. Stein and S. Wright, Subjectivity and Subjectivisation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

99.

Traugott, E. & R. Dasher. 2002. Regularity in Semantic Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

100.

Trovesi, A. 2004. La genesi di articoli determinativi. Modalità di espressione della definitezza in ceco, serbo-lusaziano e sloveno. Pavia: Franco Angeli.

101.

Tschirch, F. 1975. Geschichte der Deutschen Sprache. Berlin: Erich Schmidt Verlag.

102.

Van Gelderen, E. 2000. A History of English Reflexive Pronouns: Person, Self, and Interpretability. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

103.

Van Gelderen, E. 2004. Grammaticalization as Economy. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

104.

Van Gelderen, E. 2006. A History of the English Language. Amsterdam - Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

105.

Van Kamenade, A. & N. Vincent. 1997. Parameters of Morpho-syntactic Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

106.

Van Kemenade, A. 2000. Jespersen's Cycle Revisited: Formal Properties of Grammaticalization. In S. Pintzuk al. Diachronic Syntax. Models and Mechanisms Oxford: Oxford University Press.

107.

Van Kemenade, A. & B. Los. 2006. The Handbook of the History of English. London: Blackwell.

108.

Von der Gabelentz, G. 1901. Die Sprachwissenschaft. Ihre Aufgaben, Methoden und bisherigen Ergebnisse. Leipzig: Tauchnitz.

109.

Wanner, D. 1987. The Development of Romance Clitic Pronouns: From Latin to Old Romance. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

110.

Wood, J. 2007. Demonstratives and Possessives: From Old English to Present-Day English. In E. Stark, E. Leiss, A. Werner (eds.), Nominal Determination:Typology, Context Constraints, and Historical Emergence. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.