Article

Language Universals: Cross-lingual Comparison of Topic Dependent Adjectives

Charith Giragama1, William Martens2, Dishna Wanasinghe1, Michael Cohen1, Chandrajith Marasinghe1
Author Information & Copyright
1University of Aizu
2McGill University

Copyright ⓒ 2016, Sejong University Language Research Institue. This is an Open-Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Published Online: Jan 01, 2017

Abstract

This study examined the multilingual subjects’ perceptual similarity, and semantic relation in order to find universals of languages. Two Indo-European languages (English and Bengali) and one non-Indo- European language (Japanese) were used. A common perceptual space was obtained through Multidimensional Scaling (MDS) analysis method. In contrast, semantic approach was taken using Semantic Differential Analysis (SDA) method. Apart from these, a least square mapping method, Procrustes analysis, was also employed to determine whether semantic scales relate differently to the dimensions of the common perceptual space that did not differ be- tween these three groups of languages. Breaking the tradition of taking vowel sounds to find relation between languages, however, a sophisticated approach was taken by having six guitar sounds as stimuli, which could be considered as a common parameter for all subjects of different groups of languages. Ten topic-dependent bipolar adjective scales on which responses are taken, were constructed in a preliminary study. The results of the SDA analysis showed that the English, and Japanese semantic scales related differently to the MDS derived common perceptual space, while the Bengali semantic scales related somewhat similarly to the same common perceptual space. And also Procrustes Analysis revealed that the Bengali factor space is closer to the English factor space than to the Japanese factor space. With regard to the potential for generalizing semantic differential ratings obtained in one language to aid in the interpretation of data from listeners speaking a different native language, the results of the current study suggest that caution be exercised. More- over the results of this study suggest that interpreters will have to be cautiously attentive in interpretation of data from Indo-European family of languages (English and Bengali) to non Indo-European family of languages (Japanese).

Keywords: multilingual; automatic translation; semantic differential analysis; natural language processing; multidimensional scaling

References

1.

Berg, J. & F. Rumsey. 1999. Spatial Attribute Identification and Scaling by Repertory Grid Technique and Other Methods. Presented at the 16th In- ternational Conference Of Audio Engineering Society. Rovaniemi, Finland.

2.

Borg, I. & P. Groenen. 1997. Modern Multidimensional Scaling: Theory and Applications. New York: Springer-Verlag.

3.

Carroll, J. & J. Chang. 1970. Analysis of Individual Differences in Multi- dimensional Scaling via an N-way Generalization of "Eckart-Young" Decomposition. Psychometrika 35, 283-319.

4.

Comrie, B. 1984. Form and Function in Explaining Language Universals: In Explanations for Language Universals. Edited by B. Butterworth, B. Comrie, & O. Dahl. Berlin: Mouton.

5.

Comrie, B. 1989. Language Universals and Linguistic Typology: Syntax and Morphology. Oxford: Blackwell.

6.

Croft, W. 1990. Typology and Universals. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

7.

Boss Corp. 1999. GX-700 Guitar Effects Processor Owner's Manual. Roland Corporation USA, 5100 S. Eastern Avenue Los Angeles.

8.

Edwards, D. 1997. Discourse and Cognition. London: Sage.

9.

Gabrielsson, A. & H. Sjogren. 1979. Perceived Sound Quality of Sound- Reproducing Systems. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 65, 1019-1033.

10.

Giragama, C. 2002. Relating Japanese and Sinhalese Semantic Scales to a Common Perceptual Space. Master's Thesis. Aizu: University of Aizu.

11.

Greenberg, J. 1963. Some Universals of Grammar with Particular Reference to the Order of Meaningful Elements. In J. Greenberg (ed.), Uni- versals of Language 73-113. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

12.

Greenberg, J. 1966. Some Universals of Grammar with Particular Refer- ence to the Order of Meaningful Elements. In J. Greenberg (ed.), Universals of Language 73-113. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

13.

Greenberg, J., C. Ferguson, & E. Moravcsik. (eds.) 1978. Universals of Human Language. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

14.

Harris, R. 1985. A Primer of Multivariate Statistics. New York: Academic Press.

15.

Hawkins, J. 1983. Word Order Universals. New York: Academic Press. Hotelling, H. 1933. Analysis of a Complex of Statistical Variables into Principal Components. Journal of Educational Psychology 24, 417-520.

16.

Martens, W. & C. Giragama. 2002. Relating Multilingual Semantic Scales to a Common Timbre Space. Proceedings of 113th Convention of the Audio Engineering Society (Preprint) 5705.

17.

Martens, W., C. Marasinghe, C. Giragama, & A. Madurapperuma. 2000a. Topic-dependent Adjective Use in Japanese and Sinhala: Selection of Adjectives Differentiating Guitar Sounds. The 7th International Workshop on Human Interface Technology 27-34. Aizu: University of Aizu.

18.

Martens, W., Y. Watanabe, & A. Marui. 2000b. User-centred Control Structure for Guitar Effects Processing: Mapping Between Perceptual Dimensions and Semantic Dimensions. The 7th International Workshop on Human Interface Technology 35-44. Aizu: University of Aizu.

19.

Math Works, Inc. 2002. Matlab Statistics Toolbox. Natick, MA: Math Works, Inc.

20.

Meulman, J., W. Heiser, & J. Carroll. 1986. PREFMAP-3 User's Guide, Technical Report. Murray Hill, NJ: Bell Telephone Laboratories.

21.

Namba, S., S. Kuwano, T. Hashimoto, B. Berglund, Z. Rui, A. Schick, H. Hoege, & M. Florentine. 1991. Verbal Expression of Emotional Impression of Sound: A Cross-Cultural Study. Journal of the Acoustical Society of Japan 12.1, 19-29.

22.

Ramsay, J. 1980. The Joint Analysis of Direct Ratings, Pair Wise Preferences, and Dissimilarities. Psychometrika 45, 149-165.

23.

Rosen, V. 2003. Computing for Non-European Languages: A Perspective from Linguistics and Southeast-Asian Languages. Bergen: Advanced Computing in the Humanities (aco*hum), University of Bergen. Shiffman,.

24.

S., M. Reynold, & F. Young. 1981. Introduction to Multidimensional Scaling: Theory, Methods, and Applications. New York: Aca- demic Press.

25.

Wierzbicka, A. 1999. Emotions across Language and Culture, Diversity and Universals. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.