Numerals and their Position in Universal Grammar

Donohue, Mark

doi:10.22425/jul.2005.6.2.1

J. Univers. Lang. 2005; 6(2):1-37

pISSN: 1598-6381

DOI: https://doi.org/10.22425/jul.2005.6.2.1

Article

Numerals and their Position in Universal Grammar

Mark Donohue ¹

Author Information & Copyright ▼

¹Australian National University Singapore

Copyright ⓒ 2016, Sejong University Language Research Institue. This is an Open-Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Published Online: Jan 01, 2017

Abstract

One of Greenberg’s claims concerning the appearance of numerals as modifiers concerns the order of the elements, suggesting that post-nominal numerals are “favored in indefinite and approximate constructions”. Examining a small but representative body of data from a variety of languages, and one of the common grammaticalisation targets of singular numerals, the indefinite article, we conclude that the generalisation does not have a universal status, and exists at best as a statistical universal.

Keywords: word order; numerals; Greenberg; lexical classes

References

Baker, M. 2003. Lexical Categories: Verbs, Nouns, and Adjectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Bauer, W., W. Parker, & T. Evans. 1993. Maori. London: Routledge. Blume, K. 1998. A Contrastive Analysis of Interaction Verbs with Dative Complements. Linguistics 36, 253-280.

Börjars, K. & M. Donohue. 2000. Much Ado about Nothing: Features and Zeroes in Germanic Noun Phrases. Studia Linguistica 54, 309-353.

Burrow, T. & S. Bhattacharya. 1970. The Pengo Language. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Carlson, J. 1994. A Grammar of Supyire. (Mouton Grammar Library 15). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

Conrad, J. & K. Wogiga. 1991. An Outline of Bukiyip Grammar. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics C-113.

Croft, W. 1991. Syntactic Categories and Grammatical Relations: The Cognitive Organization of Information. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.

Donohue, M. 1999a. A Grammar of Tukang Besi. (Mouton Grammar Library no. 20). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

Donohue, M. 1999b. Syntactic Categories in Tukang Besi. Revue Québécoise de Linguistique 27, 71-90.

10.

Donohue, C. & M. Donohue. 1997. Fore Case Marking. Language and Linguistics in Melanesia 28, 69-98.

11.

Dryer, M. 1988. Object-verb Order and Adjective-noun Order: Dispelling a Myth. Lingua 74, 185-217.

12.

Dryer, M. 1991. SVO Languages and the OV: VO Typology. Language 27, 443-482.

13.

Dryer, M. 1997. Why Statistical Universals are Better than Absolute Universals. Chicago Linguistic Society 33, 123-145.

14.

Fortune, F. 1942 (1977). Arapesh. Publications of the American Ethnological Society Volume XIX. Reprinted New York: AMS.

15.

Greenberg, H. 1978. Generalizations about Numeral Systems. In J. Greenberg & E. Moravcsik (eds.), Universals of Human Language 3: Word Structure 249-295. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press. Jones, B. 2002. A Grammar of Wangkajunga, a Language of the Great.

16.

Sandy Desert of North Western Australia. Ph.D. Dissertataion, Sydney: University of Sydney.

17.

Kimball, D. 1991. Koasati Grammar. Omaha, NE: University of Nebraska Press.

18.

Malchukov, A. 2005. Case Pattern Splits, Verb Types, and Construction Competition. In M. Amberber & H. de Hoop (eds.), Competition and Variation in Natural Languages: The Case for Case 73-117. London: Elsevier.

19.

McGregor, E. & A. McGregor. 1982. Olo Language Materials. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics D-42.

20.

Mosel, U. & E. Hovdhaugen. 1992. Samoan Reference Grammar. Oslo: The Institute for Comparative Research in Human Culture,.

21.

Saltarelli, M. 1988. Basque. Croom Helm Descriptive Grammars. London: Croom Helm.

22.

Scott, G. 1978. The Fore Language of Papua New Guinea. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics B-47.

23.

Sneddon, N. 1996. Indonesian: A Comprehensive Grammar. London: Routledge.

24.

Testelec, G. 1998. On Two Parameters of Transitivity. In L. Kulikov & H. Vater (eds.), Typology of Verbal Categories. 29-45, Tübingen: Niemeyer.

25.

Tsunoda, T. 1981. Split Case-marking Patterns in Verb-types and Tense/Aspect/Mood. Linguistics 19, 5. 389-438.

26.

Tsunoda, T. 1985. Remarks on Transitivity. Journal of Linguistics 21, 2. 385-396.

27.

Tsunoda, T. 1999. Transitivity. In K. Brown & J. Miller (eds.), Concise Encyclopedia of Grammatical Categories 383-391. Amsterdam: Elsevier.

28.

Visser, E. & C. Voorhoeve. 1987. Sahu-Indonesian-English Dictionary and Sahu Grammar Sketch (Verhandelingen van het Koninklijk Instituut voor Taal-, Land- en Volkenkunde deel 126). Dordrecht: Foris.

29.

Voorhoeve, L. 1982. The West Makian Language, North Moluccas, Indonesia: A Fieldwork Report. In C. Voorhoeve (ed.), The Makian Languages and their Neighbours 1-74. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics D-46.