Your browser does not support the NLM PubReader view.

Go to this page to see a list of supporting browsers.
Journal of Universal Language
Sejong University Language Research Institue

J. Univers. Lang. 2011; 12(2):7-44

pISSN: 1598-6381

DOI: https://doi.org/10.22425/jul.2011.12.2.7

Article

Doubling as a Sign of Morphology: A Typological Perspective

Francesca Forza1,†
1University of Bologna
†Corresponding Author : Francesca Forza, Facoltà di Lingue e Letterature Straniere, Via Filippo Re 8. Phone: 3470510019; Email: francesca.forza4@unibo.it

Copyright ⓒ 2016, Sejong University Language Research Institue. This is an Open-Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Received: Jul 04, 2011; Revised: Aug 16, 2011; Accepted: Sep 06, 2011

Published Online: Jan 01, 2017

Abstract

The main goal of the paper is showing that there are three different kinds of iterative phenomena in languages: phoneme reduplication, not analyzed here, reduplication, and repetition. The phenomena differ on the basis of the grammatical components involved and therefore have very different effects. My work argues that reduplication is first and fore-most a formal phenomenon. It can involve several kinds of meaning, some of which of very iconic origin, but all the meanings get encoded grammatically. Then, phrases can be iterated, as well, and they are candidates for repetition. I take repetition to have an exclusively iconic function, basically with a single meaning: emphasis. No formal aspects are involved here. I insert the preceding generalization in the wider framework of the Parallel Architecture (Jackendoff 1997, 2002).

Keywords: typology; reduplication; morphology; syntax

REFERENCES

1.

Aronoff, M. et al. 2005. The Paradox of Sign Language Morphology. Language 81.2, 301-344.

2.

Bergman, B. & O. Dahl. 1994. Ideophones in Sign Languages? The Place of Reduplication in the Tense-Aspect System of Swedish Sign Language. In C. Bache et al. (eds.), Tense, Aspect, and Action: Empirical and Theoretical Contributions to Language Typology 397-422. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

3.

Botha, R. 1988. Form and Meaning in Word Formation: A Study of Afrikaans Reduplication. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

4.

Branchini, C. & C. Donati. 2009. Relatively Different: Italian Sign Language Relative Clauses in a Typological Perspective. In A. Liptak (ed.), Correlatives Cross-Linguistically 157-194. Amsterdam: Benjamins.

5.

Collins-Ahlgren, M. 1990. Word Formation Processes in New Zealand Sign Language. In S. Siple & P. Fischer (eds.), Theoretical Issues in Sign Language Research 279-312. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

6.

Fitzpatrick-Cole, J. 1996. Reduplication Meets the Phonological Phrase in Bengali. The Linguistic Review 13, 305-356.

7.

Ghomeshi, J. et al. 2004. Contrastive Focus Reduplication in English (the Salad-Salad Paper). Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 22, 307-357.

8.

Gil, D. 2005. From Repetition to Reduplication in Riau Indonesian. In B. Hurch (ed.), Studies on Reduplication 31-64.

9.

Inkelas, S. 2008. The Dual Theory of Reduplication. Linguistics 46, 351-402.

10.

Inkelas, S. & C. Zoll. 2005. Reduplication as Morphological Doubling. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

11.

Jackendoff, R. 1997. The Architecture of the Language Faculty. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

12.

Jackendoff, R. 2002. Foundations of Language: Brain, Meaning, Grammar, Evolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

13.

Klima, E. & U. Bellugi. 1979. The Signs of Language. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

14.

Kyle, J. & B. Woll. 1985. Sign Language: The Study of Deaf People and their Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

15.

Lane, G. & F. Grosjean. 1980. Recent Perspectives on American Sign Language. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.

16.

Marantz, A. 1982. Reduplication. Linguistic Inquiry 13, 435-482.

17.

Nelson, N. 2003. Asymmetric Anchoring. Ph.D Dissertation. Rutgers University.

18.

Newport, E. & P. Meier. 1987. The Acquisition of American Sign Language. In I. Solbin (ed.), The Crosslinguistic Study of Language Acquisition I 881-938. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

19.

Nordlander, J. & N. Shrimpton. 2003. Reduplication in the Krio New Testament. In S. Kouwenberg (ed.), Twice as Meaningful: Reduplication in Pidgins, Creoles, and Other Contact Languages 121-132. London: Battlebridge.

20.

Paul, M. 2009. The Ethnologue. Available at URL <http://www.Ethnologue.com>.

21.

Perlmutter, D. 1990. On the Segmental Representation of Transitional and Bidirectional Movements in American Sign Language Phonology. In P. Siple & S. Fischer (eds.), Theoretical Issues in Sign Language Research 67-80. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago.

22.

Pfau, R. & M. Steinbach. 2006. Pluralization in Sign and in Speech: A Cross-Modal Typological Study. Linguistic Typology 10.2, 135-182.

23.

Poizner, H. et al. 1987. What the Hands Reveal about the Brain. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

24.

Riggle, J. 2003. Nonlocal Reduplication. Proceedings of the North East Linguistic Society 34, 485-496. Amherst, MA: GLSA.

25.

Rubino, C. 2005. Reduplication. In M. Haspelmath (ed.), World Atlas of Language Structures 114-117. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

26.

Russo Cardona, T. & V. Volterra. 2007. Le lingue dei segni. Rome: Carocci.

27.

Sadler, W. 1989. Sequentiality and Simultaneity in American Sign Language. Dordrecht: Foris.

28.

Sapir, E. 1921. Language: An Introduction to the Study of Speech. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.

29.

Siple, P. & S. Fischer. 1990. Theoretical Issues in Sign Language Research. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

30.

Stokoe, W. 1960/1978. Sign Language Structure: An Outline of the Visual Communication Systems of the American Deaf. Silver Spring, MD: Linstok Press.

31.

Supalla, T. & E. Newport. 1978. How Many Seats in a Chair? The Derivation of Nouns and Verbs in ASL. In P. Siple (ed.), Understanding Language through Sign Language Research 91-132. New York: Academic Press.

32.

Topping, D. 1973. Chamorro Reference Grammar. Honolulu, HI: University of Hawaii Press.

33.

Thun, N. 1963. Reduplicative Words in English. Lund: Carl Bloms Boktryckeri.

34.

Uspensky, A. 1972. Subsystems in Language, their Interrelations, and their Correlated Universals. Linguistics 88, 53-71.

35.

Wilbur, R. 1973. The Phonology of Reduplication. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Linguistics Club.

36.

Wilbur, R. et al. 1983. Roots: The Search for the Origins of Signs in ASL. In J. Richardson et al. (eds.), The Parasession on the Interplay of Phonology, Morphology, and Syntax 314-336. Chicago, IL: Chicago Linguistic Society.

37.

Yu, A. 2005. Toward a Typology of Compensatory Reduplication. In J. Alderete (ed.), Proceedings of the 24th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics 397-405. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.