Marketing an International Auxiliary Language: Challenges to a New Artificial Language

Neil Olsen¹

¹Salt Lake City, Utah

Copyright ⓒ 2016, Sejong University Language Research Institue. This is an Open-Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Published Online: Jan 01, 2017

Abstract

This paper examines international auxiliary languages from the point of view that they are products competing in the world linguistic market place. Several factors have contributed to the proliferation of artificial or constructed languages in recent decades. The globalization of social, economic, and intellectual information through the World Wide Web (internet) has made access to the tremendous theoretical and practical progress and educational advances in the field of linguistics, language learning, and language planning. In a world where designer and hobby languages abound, how can an international auxiliary language attract a clientele and achieve the goal of facilitating international communication? The “experiences” of Volapük, Esperanto, Loglan/Lojban, and Klingon are examined as case studies.

Keywords: auxiliary language; Volapük; Esperanto; Loglan/Lojban; Klingon

References

Annernäs, S. 1996. Klingon Questionnaire. Available at URL <http://home1.swipnet.se/~w-12689/survey.htm>.

Brown, J. 1960. Loglan. Scientific American 202, 53-63.

Brown, J. 1989. Loglan 1: A Logical Language (4th edition). Gainesville, FL: The Loglan Institute.

Choo, M. 2001. The Need for "Unish", a Universal Language and the Principles of its Development. Journal of Universal Language 2, 3-14.

Comrie, B. 1989. Language Universals and Linguistic Typology (2nd edition). Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.

Cowan, J. 1997. The Complete Lojban Language (1st edition). Fairfax, VG: The Logical Language Group, Inc.

Elgin, S. 1999. "Láadan, the Constructed Language in Native Tongue." Available at URL <http://www.sfwa.org/members/elgin/Laadan.html>.

Hermans, J. 1999. "Klingon and its Users: A Sociolinguistic Profile." M.A. thesis. Tilburg: Tilburg University. Available at URL <http://www.geocities.com/judith_hh/scripdef.htm>.

Keith, A. 1998. Other Constructed Languages. Available at URL <http://www.loglan.org/other-conlang-info.html>.

10.

Large, A. 2002. The New Babel: Language Barriers on the World Wide Web. Journal of Universal Language 3, 77-95.

11.

Lee, C. 2001. An Agenda for Action toward a New International Language Order. Journal of Universal Language 2, 51-60.

12.

Mead, M. & R. Modley. 1968. Communication among All People, Every where. Natural History 77.7, 56-63.

13.

Okrand, M. 1992a "Conversational Klingon." Read by M. Dorn, Audiocas- sette. New York: Simon and Schuster, Audioworks.

14.

Okrand, M. 1992b. The Klingon Dictionary: English/Klingon, Klin gon/English. New York: Pocket Books.

15.

Oliver, G. 1996. Vaj TlhIngan Hol Dajathlh 'e' DaneH: So you Want to Speak Klingon. Available at URL <http://www.canoe.ca/Jam Books Features/okrand_marc.html>.

16.

Olsen, N. 2000 The Future of Koho: A Mon-Khmer Language of Viêt Nam. In Ostler, N & B. Rudes (eds.), Endangered Languages and Literacy: Proceedings of the 4th Foundation for Endangered Languages Conference 43-46. Bath: The Foundation for Endangered Languages.

17.

Sapir, E. 1931. Wanted: A World Language. American Mercury 22.86, 202-209.

18.

Schoen, L. 2002. "No. of Klingon Speakers." E-mail to the Author. 25 June.

19.

Yaguello, M. 1991. Lunatic Lovers of Language: Imaginary Languages and their Inventors. London: The Athlone Press.