Your browser does not support the NLM PubReader view.

Go to this page to see a list of supporting browsers.
Journal of Universal Language
Sejong University Language Research Institue

J. Univers. Lang. 2006; 7(1):29-47

pISSN: 1598-6381

DOI: https://doi.org/10.22425/jul.2006.7.1.29

Article

Internal and External Forces in Typology: Evidence from Iranian Languages

Mohammad Dabir-Moghaddam1
1Allameh Tabataba’i University

Copyright ⓒ 2016, Sejong University Language Research Institue. This is an Open-Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Published Online: Jan 01, 2017

Abstract

In this article the debate in the literature on the role of internal and external forces in shaping the typological features of a language is evaluated in the light of the evidence from Iranian languages. In this study the Greenbergian word order correlations as presented in Dryer (1992) are adopted as the theoretical and statistical framework. On that basis the common typological parameters of the languages studied are identified and the variations in them are also specified. Then the potential and actual areas of convergence/interference of these languages as substrata with Modern Persian as the superstratum are discussed. Despite instances of convergence/interference, the findings reveal the strength of the parameters of variation at the present time. However, the situation in regard to some of these languages is such that instances of even language shift in near future are not unexpected. Hence, it appears that in the Iranian languages studied the impacts of the internal and external forces in typology are potential and relativistic.

Keywords: word order; Iranian languages; internal forces; external forces

References

1.

Brunner, C. 1977. A Syntax of Western Middle Iranian. Delmar & New York: Caravan Books.

2.

Comrie, B. 1989. Language Universals and Linguistic Typology. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

3.

Dabir-Moghaddam, M. 1992. On the (In)dependence of Syntax and Pragmatics: Evidence from the Postposition-rā in Persian. In D. Stein (ed.), Cooperating with Written Texts: The Pragmatics and Comprehension of Written Texts 549-573. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

4.

Dabir-Moghaddam, M. 1997. Descriptive and Theoretical Aspects of Word Order Status in Persian and Selected Iranian Languages. In B. Caron (ed.), Proceedings of the 16th International Congress of Linguists. London: Elsevier Science Ltd.

5.

Dabir-Moghaddam, M. 2001. Word Order Typology of Iranian Languages. The Journal of Humanities 2.8, 17-23.

6.

Dryer, M. 1992. The Greenbergian Word Order Correlations. Language 68, 81-138.

7.

Gerritsen, M. 1984. Divergent Word Order Developments in Germanic Languages: A Description and a Tentative Explanation. In J. Fisiak (ed.), Historical Syntax 107-136. Berlin: Mouton.

8.

Greenberg, J. 1963. Some Universals of Grammar with Particular Reference to the Order of Meaningful Elements. In J. Greenberg (ed.), Universals of Language 73-113. Cambridge: MIT Press.

9.

Harris, A. & L. Campbell. 1995. Historical Syntax in Cross-linguistic Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

10.

Haspelmath, M., E. König, W. Oesterreicher, & W. Raible. (eds.). 2001. Language Typology and Language Universals 1. Berlin & New York: Walter de Gruyter.

11.

Heston, W. 1976. Selected Problems in Fifth to Tenth Century Iranian Syntax. Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania.

12.

Hickey, R. 2002. Internal and External Forces Again: Changes in Word Order in Old English and Old Irish. Language Sciences 24, 261-283.

13.

Kent, R. 1950. Old Persian. New Haven, CT: American Oriental Society.

14.

Lass, R. 1994. Old English: A Historical Linguistic Companion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

15.

Lass, R. 1997. Historical Linguistics and Language Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

16.

Lazard, G. 1970. Etude quantitative de l'evolution d'un morpheme: La postposition rā en Persan. In D. Cohen (ed.), Melanges Marcel Cohen 381-388. The Hague & Paris: Mouton.

17.

Meillet, A. 1914. Le problème de la parenté des langues. Scientia 15-35.

18.

Sapir, E. 1921. Language. New York: Harcourt, Brace, and World.

19.

Vennemann, T. 1994. Linguistic Reconstruction in the Context of European Prehistory. Transactions of the Philological Society 92.2, 215-284.